Spectrum of perforated peptic ulcer disease in a tertiary care hospital in South India: predictors of morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Perforated peptic ulcer remains one of the most common surgical emergencies in India with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify the perioperative risk factors influencing the post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease. METHODS: Five-hundred patients who underwent surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in our institution in the preceding 8 years were included in this observational retrospective study. Their clinical presentations, peri-operative managements were studied and analysed. RESULTS: Five hundred cases were analysed of which 96% were males. Mean age was 46.5 years. A total of 160 patients had duodenal perforation and 328 had gastric perforation with a mean size of 8.6 mm. Most patients (96.2%) underwent omental patch closure of the perforation with mean length of hospitalization being 14 days. The most common major and minor postoperative complications were prolonged intubation and pulmonary complaints respectively. Re-exploration was needed in 6.2% of cases with a post-operative leak rate of 5.8%. Age >60 years, presence of comorbid illnesses, shock at presentation and perforation size >1 cm were identified as independent predictors of postoperative morbidity. Overall mortality was 11.6% while specific mortality among males and females were 11.8% and 5% respectively. Age >60 years, shock at presentation, presence of abdominal rigidity and size of perforation >1 cm were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: Old age, comorbidities, shock at presentation, perforation size >1 cm, higher ASA grade, prolonged surgery and biliopurulent contamination >500 mL were independent predictors of both increased post-operative morbidity and mortality.

Role of specific nutritional biomarkers in predicting post-operative complications among patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery.

PURPOSE: Nutritional biomarkers like serum prealbumin, transferrin, retinol-binding protein (RBP), C-reactive protein (CRP), leptin, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) have the inherent ability to diagnose undernutrition objectively before it is clinically manifested. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the specific nutritional biomarkers in predicting post-operative complications. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in the department of surgery and included all patients aged 18 years and above who underwent elective abdominal surgery. Demographic details and clinical and surgical details were documented from the case records. Nutritional biomarker assay was done at admission. The post-operative complications occurring until discharge were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. The diagnostic accuracy of the specific nutritional biomarkers in predicting post-operative complications was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 320 patients were included in the study. Of these, 126 (39.38%) developed post-operative complications. Major complications accounted for 19.05% of the complications, while 80.95% were minor complications. Patients with blood prealbumin level less than 17.287 mg/dL had a higher incidence of complications (p < 0.001). Serum transferrin levels less than 168.04 mg/dL and IGF1 levels less than < 44.51 ng/ml showed increased incidence of complications (p < 0.001). The AUC was found to be the highest for serum IGF1 with 0.7782. Sensitivity was equally high for IGF1 and serum transferrin, with 76.98% for the former and 76.19% for the latter. CONCLUSION: Specific nutritional biomarkers, like serum prealbumin and transferrin, were efficient in predicting postoperative complications of patients before undergoing elective abdominal surgeries even after adjusting for confounders. This can facilitate preoperative corrective measures to lower the overall postoperative complications.

Comparison of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway Versus Standard Care in Patients Undergoing Elective Stoma Reversal Surgery- A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Practices such as prolonged preoperative fasting, bowel preparation, delayed ambulation and resumption of orals result in morbidity in 15-20% of stoma reversal cases which can be improved by Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways. AIM: To evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of ERAS pathway in patients undergoing elective loop ileostomy or colostomy reversal surgery METHODS: This was an open-labeled, superiority randomized controlled trial in which patients undergoing loop ileostomy or colostomy reversal were randomized to standard or ERAS care. Patients with ASA class ≥3, needing laparotomy for stoma reversal, cardiac, renal and neurological illnesses were excluded. Components of ERAS protocol included pre-operative carbohydrate loading, avoidance of mechanical bowel preparation, goal directed fluid therapy, avoidance of long-acting opioid anesthetics or analgesics, avoidance of drains, urinary catheter or nasogastric tube, early mobilization and early enteral feeding. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS) while the secondary outcomes were postoperative recovery and morbidity parameters. RESULTS: Forty patients each were randomized to standard care and ERAS. Demographic and laboratory parameters between the two groups were comparable. ERAS group patients had significantly reduced LOS (5.3 ± 0.3 vs 7 ± 2.6; mean difference: 1.73 ± 0.98; p=0.0008). Functional recovery was earlier in the ERAS group compared to the standard care group, such as early resolution of ileus (median-2 days; p<0.001), time to first stool (median-3 days; p=0.0002), time to the resumption of liquid diet (median-3 days; p<0.001) and solid diet (median-4 days; p<0.001). Surgical site infections (SSI) were significantly lesser in ERAS group (12.5% vs 32.5%; p=0.03) while postoperative nausea/vomiting (p=0.08), pulmonary complications (p=0.17) and urinary tract infections (p=0.56) were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: ERAS pathways are feasible, safe and significantly reduces LOS in patients undergoing elective loop ileostomy or colostomy reversal surgery.

Comparison of Short-Course and Conventional Antimicrobial Duration in Mild and Moderate Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections: A randomised controlled trial.

Objectives: Studies have shown the feasibility of short-course antimicrobials in complicated intra-abdominal infection (CIAI) following source control procedure (SCP). This study aimed to compare postoperative complication rates in short-course (5 days) and conventional (7-10 days) duration groups after antimicrobial therapy. Methods: This was a single-centre, open-labelled, randomised controlled trial conducted in Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India, from July 2017 to December 2019 on patients with CIAI. Patients who were haemodynamically unstable, pregnant and had non-perforated, non-gangrenous appendicitis or cholecystitis were excluded. Primary endpoints were surgical site infection (SSI), recurrent intra-abdominal infection (IAI) and mortality. Secondary endpoints included time till occurrence of composite primary outcomes, duration of antimicrobial therapy, the length of hospital stays, antimicrobial-free interval, hospital-free days at 30 day intervals and the presence of extra-abdominal infections. Results: Overall, 140 patients were included whose demographic and clinico-pathological details were comparable in both groups. There was no difference in SSI (37% versus 35.6%) and recurrent IAI (5.7% versus 2.8%; P = 0.76); no mortality was observed in either groups. The composite primary outcome (37% versus 35.7%) was also similar in both groups. Secondary outcomes included the duration of antimicrobial therapy (5 versus 8 days; P <0.001) and length of hospitalisation (5 versus 7 days; P = 0.014) were significant. Times till occurrence of SSI and recurrent IAI, incidence of extra-abdominal infection and resistant pathogens were comparable. Conclusion: Short-course antimicrobial therapy for 5 days following SCP for mild and moderate CIAI was comparable to conventional duration antimicrobial therapy, indicating similar efficacy.

Diagnostic Utility of NLR, PLR and MLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer: an Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are linked with the pathogenesis of gastric cancer (GC). However, the clinical significance of the combination of these markers is unclear. Hence, this study was carried out to determine the individual and combined diagnostic accuracy of NLR, PLR and MLR among patients with GC. METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, patients were recruited into three groups, GC, precancerous lesions and age and gender-matched controls. The primary outcome was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of GC. The secondary outcome was to determine the correlation of inflammatory markers with the stage of gastric cancer, nodal involvement and metastasis. RESULTS: A total of 228 patients, 76 in each group, were enrolled. The cut-off value of NLR, PLR and MLR were 2.23, 146.8 and 0.26, respectively, for the diagnosis of GC. The diagnostic abilities of NLR, PLR and MLR were significantly high at 79, 75 and 68.4, respectively, to predict GC compared to precancerous and control groups. All the models of inflammatory markers showed excellent discrimination between GC and the controls with an AUC > 0.7. The models also showed acceptable discrimination between GC and the precancerous lesion group with AUC between 0.65 and 0.70. No significant difference was found in correlating inflammatory markers with clinicopathological features. CONCLUSION: The discrimination capacity of the inflammatory markers could be used as screening biomarkers in diagnosing GC, even in its early stages.

Is There an Association between Variceal Bleed and Helicobacter pylori Infection in Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Hypertension?: A prospective cohort study.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the association between Helicobacter pylori infection and variceal bleeding as well as rebleeding in cases of cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Methods: This prospective cohort study included patients with bleeding oesophageal varices and was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India, from August 2016 to July 2018. Results: A total of 190 patients were assessed for eligibility, of which 159 patients were included in this study. Among the 159 patients, 124 (78.0%) had alcohol-related liver disease and eight had hepatitis B virus-related liver disease. Seven patients with varices had bled neither at presentation nor during the follow-up period. A total of 78 (49.1%) patients were H. pylori infected. The primary outcome, which was correlation between prevalence of H. pylori and the incidence of bleeding/rebleeding from varices as well as encephalopathy found that patients with oesophageal varices (adjusted risk [AR] = 0.714) and H. pylori infection (AR = 0.682) had a lower risk of variceal rebleeding. Among H. pylori-negative patients, pepsinogen I was higher in patients with rebleeding (30.7 versus 14.4 ng/mL; P <0.001). The secondary outcome, which was correlation of the site of bleeding with H. pylori infection and the association of the ratio of pepsinogen I/II with bleeding showed that among H. pylori-positive patients, the ratio of pepsinogen I/II was higher in patients with rebleeding (2.9 versus 1.3 ng/mL; P = 0.023). Conclusion: H. pylori infection was associated with a lower risk of rebleeding in cases of cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Irrespective of the status of the H. pylori infection, rebleeding was associated with increased levels of gastric acid output, as demonstrated by the level of pepsinogen.

The Diagnostic Dilemma of Ruptured Liver Metastasis in a Patient with Lung Cancer: A case report.

Spontaneous rupture of a metastatic liver tumour is rarely documented in the literature when compared to hepatocellular carcinoma and other liver lesions, especially from a lung primary. We report a case of ruptured liver metastasis from an adenocarcinoma of the lung mimicking ruptured liver abscess, challenging the clinical diagnosis. A 42-year-female patient presented to a tertiary care institute in 2020 with complaints of abdominal pain, breathlessness and fever. On examination, the patient was tachypnoeic with a right hypochondriac mass. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography of abdomen and thorax revealed an ill-defined heterogeneously enhancing lesion in the liver with a communicating subcapsular collection and hypo-enhancing lesions in the left lobe and heterogeneously enhancing lesion in the left lung. Adenocarcinoma of the lung with hepatic metastasis was confirmed with a core needle biopsy. The patient was managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics, intercostal drainage tube and gefitinib. However, despite best efforts, the patient succumbed to the disease.

Acute Upper Non-variceal and Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common surgical emergency requiring hospital admission and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Appropriate decision-making is essential to make a prompt diagnosis, accurate risk assessment, and proper resuscitation of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Despite multiple randomized trials and meta-analyses, there is still controversy on various management issues like appropriate risk stratification, the timing of endoscopy, choosing an appropriate endoscopic, and radiological intervention in these groups of patients. As the usage of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet, and antithrombotic agents is common in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, the physician is challenged with proper management of these drugs. The present review summarizes the current strategies for risk stratification, localization of bleeding source, endoscopic and radiological intervention in patients with acute nonvariceal upper GI, middle GI, and lower GI bleeding.

Association Between Helicobacter pylori and Periampullary and Pancreatic Cancer: a Case-Control Study.

INTRODUCTION: Helicobacter pylori has been implicated in the etiopathogenesis of various malignant conditions; however, there is a dearth of studies on the correlation between H. pylori infection and pancreatic cancers. Hence, this study was carried out to evaluate the association between H. pylori infection and periampullary and pancreatic cancer. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective, case-control study in which all consecutive patients of periampullary or pancreatic cancer were included. The demographic details with tumour characteristics were recorded. Age and gender-matched controls were patients with other extra-abdominal benign conditions. H. pylori and the Cag A status were determined using IgG antibodies and Cag A antibodies respectively. The association between H. pylori infection and periampullary and pancreatic cancer was the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients, 61 in the study and 94 in the control group were included. The overall prevalence of H. pylori in the study group (78.6%) was similar to that of the control group (76.5%) (p = 0.76). Although a higher trend of IgG and Cag A seropositivity was seen in the study group, the difference was not significant. The correlation of H. pylori and Cag A seropositivity showed a higher trend with site-specificity, differentiation, and nodal status. However, the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: There was no association between H. pylori infection and Cag A seropositivity with periampullary and pancreatic cancers. The various tumour characteristics were also not associated with H. pylori infection. Thus, routine eradication of H. pylori infection may not be recommended in periampullary and pancreatic cancers.

Factors predicting prolonged hospitalization after abdominal wall hernia repair - a prospective observational study.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the factors predicting prolonged hospitalization following abdominal wall hernia repair. Material and Methods: This was a prospective observational study which included patients operated for elective and emergency abdominal wall hernias. Details of the patients including demographic profile, hernia characteristics, and perioperative factors were collected. Patients were followed up till discharge from the hospital to record the postoperative local and systemic complications. Patients who stayed for more than three days were considered as longer hospital stay. Analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the longer hospital stay. Results: A total of 200 consecutive patients of abdominal wall hernia were included over a period of two years. Female sex (p <0.05), obesity (p= 0.022), and smoking and alcohol consumption (0.002) led to a prolonged hospital stay. Patients with incisional hernias (p <0.05), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of two or more (p= 0.002), complicated hernia (p= 0.007), emergency surgeries (p= 0.002), general anesthesia (p= 0.001), longer duration of surgery (>60 minutes, p <0.05), usage of drain (p <0.05), and surgical site infection (SSI, p= 0.001) were significantly associated with increased length of hospital stay. Whereas, age distribution, socio-economic status, co-morbidities, recurrent surgery, type of hernia repair and the level of surgeon did not affect the length of hospital stay. Conclusion: The risk factors associated with prolonged hospital stay in patients undergoing abdominal wall hernia repair were female sex, obesity, smoking and alcoholism, incisional hernia, complicated hernias, higher ASA class, and prolonged duration of surgeries.